Donald Trump may have alienated some prominent Republicans during his presidential campaign, but he could find common ground with his party’s lawmakers on the subject of US corporate tax reform. This post explores how Trump’s presidency will likely affect US corporate taxation and cash repatriation rules.
On August 30, 2016, the European Commission found that Ireland granted illegal tax benefits to Apple Inc., and demanded that Apple repay €13 billion to Irish tax authorities. We provide a clear, concise summary of the situation and tell you what you need to consider in the wake of the ruling.
Companies of all sizes — not just behemoths like Google and Facebook — are under increased scrutiny from tax authorities. We are in a time when corporate tax laws around the globe are evolving at a quick pace, and this understandably leaves many corporations uneasy and looking for clarity. Let’s look at two scenarios involving how a multinational might be taxed by two sets of tax authorities on the same income. Equipped with this knowledge, you may be able to avoid these kinds of pitfalls, or at least be prepared for the possibility that they may arise.
The Republic of Ireland is known throughout the world for attracting foreign investment through its low corporation tax rate, which now stands at 12.5%. Northern Ireland, by contrast, follows the UK-mandated 20% rate. Not surprisingly, Northern Ireland has struggled in recent years to woo foreign direct investors away from its closest neighbor.Provided that certain political hurdles can be overcome, competition between the two border countries for foreign investment may become more balanced over the next few years after the introduction of new tax legislation.
Big developments are afoot in the world of international tax. Ireland has announced that it will end the “Double Irish,” the tax loophole that’s allowed multinationals to organize their affairs in such a way that they pay very low effective tax rates — sometimes as low as 2 percent.